Cases 1 - 8 of 8
TPI Holdings, Inc. et al v. Classic Trader, GMBH
as 1:2017cv00442
Plaintiff:
TPI Holdings, Inc. , Autotrader.com, Inc. and Dominion Enterprises
Defendant:
Classic Trader, GMBH
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
TPI Holdings, Inc. et al v. Trader Interactive, LLC et al
as 1:2012cv04383
Plaintiff:
TPI Holdings, Inc. , Dominion Enterprises and Autotrader.com, Inc.
Defendant:
Trader Interactive, LLC , Jeffrey Schwartz and John Does 1-10
TPI Holdings, Inc. et al v. B2Betrader LLC
as 1:2012cv01584
Plaintiff:
TPI Holdings, Inc. and Dominion Enterprises
Defendant:
B2Betrader LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
United Advertising Publications, Inc. et al v. Kinetoscope Media, Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv02403
Plaintiff:
United Advertising Publications, Inc. and Dominion Enterprises
Defendant:
Kinetoscope Media, Inc. and Mash Web Holdings, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
TPI Holdings, Inc. et al v. Navigator Multimedia, Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv04091
Plaintiff:
TPI Holdings, Inc. and Dominion Enterprises
Defendant:
Rudy Schellenberger
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
TPI Holdings, Inc. et al v. Smith et al
as 1:2009cv01919
Plaintiff:
TPI Holdings, Inc. and Dominion Enterprises
Defendant:
Wesley Smith, Jimmie Smith, Mackenzie Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Type:
Intellectual Property
TPI Holdings, Inc. et al v. Schoch
as 1:2009cv00844
Plaintiff:
TPI Holdings, Inc. and Dominion Enterprises
Defendant:
John Schoch and JF Schoch Building Corp.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 a False representation-goods sold-interstate commer
TPI Holdings, Inc. et al v. Winfield Dyco Holdings LTD. et al
as 1:2009cv00801
Plaintiff:
TPI Holdings, Inc. and Dominion Enterprises
Defendant:
Winfield Dyco Holdings LTD. and Natco Trading Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
