Cases 31 - 36 of 36
DEFENSE V UNITED TECHNOLOGIES
as 02-1071
Amicus Curiae:
AEROSPACE INDUSTRIES ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA, INC., COMMITTEE ON GOVERNMENT BUSINESS OF FINANCIAL EXECUTIVES INTERNATIONAL, MANUFACTURERS ALLIANCE/MAPI Inc. and others
Appellant:
DONALD H. RUMSFELD, SECRETARY OF DEFENSE, DONALD H. RUMSFELD, SECRETARY OF DEFENSE, DONALD H. RUMSFELD, SECRETARY OF DEFENSE and others
Appellee:
UNITED TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION, PRATT & WHITNEY, UNITED TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION, PRATT & WHITNEY, UNITED TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION, PRATT & WHITNEY and others
EASTMAN KODAK V DEFENSE
as 02-1058
Appellee:
DONALD H. RUMSFELD, SECRETARY OF DEFENSE, DONALD H. RUMSFELD, SECRETARY OF DEFENSE, DONALD H. RUMSFELD, SECRETARY OF DEFENSE and others
Appellant:
EASTMAN KODAK COMPANY, EASTMAN KODAK COMPANY, EASTMAN KODAK COMPANY and others
KEARFOTT GUIDANCE V DEFENSE
as 02-1039
Amicus Curiae:
BAE SYSTEMS Information & Electronic Systems Integration,Inc, DynCorp Information Systems, LLC, BAE SYSTEMS Information & Electronic Systems Integration,Inc and others
Appellee:
DONALD H. RUMSFELD, Secretary of Defense, DONALD H. RUMSFELD, Secretary of Defense, DONALD H. RUMSFELD, Secretary of Defense and others
Appellant:
KEARFOTT GUIDANCE & NAVIGATION CORPORATION, KEARFOTT GUIDANCE & NAVIGATION CORPORATION, KEARFOTT GUIDANCE & NAVIGATION CORPORATION and others
DEFENSE V APPLIED COMPANIES
as 01-1630
Appellee:
APPLIED COMPANIES, INC.
Appellant:
Donald H. Rumsfeld, SECRETARY OF DEFENSE
NESS MANUFACTURING V DEFENSE
as 01-1351
Appellee:
DONALD H. RUMSFELD, SECRETARY OF DEFENSE, DONALD H. RUMSFELD, SECRETARY OF DEFENSE and DONALD H. RUMSFELD, SECRETARY OF DEFENSE
Appellant:
NESS MANUFACTURING, INC., NESS MANUFACTURING, INC. and NESS MANUFACTURING, INC.
UNITED TECHNOLOGIES CORP V DEFENSE
as 00-1337
Appellee:
DONALD H. RUMSFELD, SECRETARY OF DEFENSE
Appellant:
UNITED TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
