Intellectual Property Cases filed in the Second Circuit Courts
Takeda Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. et al v. Dr. Reddy's Laboratories, Ltd. et al
as 1:2011cv02253
Plaintiff: Takeda Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. , Takeda Pharmaceuticals North America, Inc. , Takeda Pharmaceuticals LLC and others
Defendant: Dr. Reddy's Laboratories, Ltd. and Dr. Reddy's Laboratories, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Astrazenca AB et al v. Dr. Reddy's Laboratories, Ltd. et al
as 1:2007cv06790
Plaintiff: Astrazenca AB, Astrazenca AB, Astrazenca AB and others
Defendant: Dr. Reddy's Laboratories, Ltd. and Dr. Reddy's Laboratories, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
In Re: Rivastigmine Patent Litigation Featured Case
as 1:2005md01661
Plaintiff: Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation and others
Defendant: Dr. Reddy's Laboratories, Ltd., Dr. Reddy's Laboratories, Inc., Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. and others
Counter Claimant: Dr. Reddy's Laboratories, Inc. and Dr. Reddy's Laboratories, Ltd.
Counter Defendant: Novartis AG, Novartis Pharma AG, Novartis International Pharmaceutical Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Sanofi-Synthelabo, et al v. Apotex Inc., et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2002cv02255
Plaintiff: Sanofi-Synthelabo , Sanofi-Synthelabo Inc. , Bristol-Myers Squibb Sanofi Pharmaceuticals Holding Partnership and others
Defendant: Apotex Inc. , Apotex Corp. , Dr. Reddy's Laboratories, Ltd. and others
Counter_claimant: Apotex Inc. and Apotex Corp.
Counter_defendant: Sanofi-Synthelabo, Sanofi-Synthelabo Inc. and Bristol-Myers Squibb Sanofi Pharmaceuticals Holding Partnership
Amicu: National Association of Chain Drug Stores
Movant: Bristol-Myers Squibb Company and Andrew G. Bodnar
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?