Other Statutes Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 63
Picazo v. Aptos Berry Farms, Inc., et al.
as 24-2089
Plaintiff: RICARDO PICAZO
Defendant: APTOS BERRY FARMS, INC. and DRISCOLL'S, INC.
Cluse v. Rowden, et al.
as 24-2045
Plaintiff: DANIEL WILLIAM CLUSE
Defendant: TRAVIS JAMES ROWDEN, in his individual and official capacities, COUNTY OF COCONINO and JIM DRISCOLL, Sheriff
United Behavioral Health v. United States District Court for the Northern District of California, San Francisco
as 24-242
Petitioner: UNITED BEHAVIORAL HEALTH
Respondent: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO
Not Classified By Court: DAVID WIT, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, NATASHA WIT, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, BRIAN MUIR, on his own behalf and on behalf of all others similarly situated and others
Picazo dba Salinas Farms v. Aptos Berry Farms, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2023cv02735
Plaintiff: Ricardo Picazo dba Salinas Farms and Ricardo Picazo doing business as Salinas Farms
Defendant: Aptos Berry Farms, Inc., Driscoll's Inc. and Does 1 - 20, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 07 U.S.C. § 499 Agricultural Commodities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00005
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Jerome Driscoll v. R. Fisher, Jr.
as 21-16596
Petitioner / Appellant: JEROME DRISCOLL
Respondent / Appellee: R. FISHER, Jr.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv00317
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Angelica Clark, et al v. Chad Wolf, et al
as 21-35560
Plaintiff / Appellant: ANGELICA CLARK, ELLEN GASS, NATHANIEL WEST and others
Plaintiff: ROBERT EVANS and GARRISON DAVIS
Defendant / Appellee: CHAD F. WOLF, Secretary United States Department of Homeland Security and KENNETH T. CUCCINELLI, Senior Official Performing the Duties of the Deputy Secretary United States Department of Homeland Security
Defendant: JOHN DOE SUPERVISORY AND PATROL-LEVEL DEFENDANTS, 1-140; agents of the U.S. Marshals Service, Federal Protective Service, U.S. Department of Homeland Security and U.S. Customs and Border Protection, acting in concert and in their individual capacitie, GABRIEL RUSSELL, ALLEN JONES and others
Carlisle v. NantKwest, Inc. et al
as 3:2021cv00304
Defendant: Michael D. Blaszyk, NantKwest, Inc., Patrick Soon-Shiong and others
Plaintiff: Samuel Carlisle
Weiss v. Nantkwest, Inc. et al
as 3:2021cv00280
Defendant: Michael D. Blaszyk, Nantkwest, Inc., Patrick Soon-Shiong and others
Plaintiff: Annie Weiss

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?