Cases 51 - 60 of 395
Lietz v. Drug Enforcement Administration
as 1:2022cv00136
Plaintiff:
Paul Lietz
Defendant:
Drug Enforcement Administration
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
John Qian v. USDEA, et al
as 22-70039
Petitioner:
JOHN X. QIAN, M.D.
Respondent:
U.S. DRUG ENFORCEMENT ADMINISTRATION, MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General and ANNE MILGRAM, in her Official Capacity as Administrator of the U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration
Samson Orusa v. DEA
as 22-3132
Petitioner:
SAMSON KANLA ORUSA, M.D.
Respondent:
DRUG ENFORCEMENT ADMINISTRATION
Ricardo Fertil v. DEA
as 22-1003
Petitioner:
Ricardo Fertil
Respondent:
Drug Enforcement Administration
Norman Clement v. DEA
as 21-1262
Petitioner:
Norman Clement
Respondent:
Drug Enforcement Administration
American Civil Liberties Union et al v. United States Customs and Border Protection et al
as 1:2021cv10430
Plaintiff:
ACLU, ACLU Foundation, American Civil Liberties Union and others
Defendant:
United States Customs and Border Protection, United States Drug Enforcement Administration, United States Department of Homeland Security and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Stephen Zyszkiewicz v. DEA, et al
as 21-1238
Petitioner:
Stephen Cameron Zyszkiewicz
Respondent:
Drug Enforcement Administration, Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General and Anne Milgram, Administrator, Drug Enforcement Administration
Costadaryll Hughley v. Federal Drug Enforcement Administration, et al
as 21-13840
Plaintiff / Appellant:
COSTADARYLL HUGHLEY
Defendant / Appellee:
FEDERAL DRUG ENFORCEMENT ADMINISTRATION, Administrator, Orlando District Office, TIMOTHY J. SHEA, KELLEY PENNINGTON, S.A. and others
Cincinnati Enquirer v. Dept of Justice, et al
as 21-3966
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CINCINNATI ENQUIRER, A division of Gannett GP Media, Inc.
Defendant / Appellee:
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and DRUG ENFORCEMENT ADMINISTRATION
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
