Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Willie Smith v. Drugh Waggener, et al
as 20-15891
Defendant:
C. KERNER, FLETCHER, Mr., AMOS LOFING and others
Defendant / Appellee:
DRUGH WAGGENER
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WILLIE T. SMITH
Max Reed, II v. James Cox, et al
as 19-15476
Defendant:
ELY STATE PRISON, WEISS, SHANNON MOYLE and others
Defendant / Appellee:
REX REED, ISIDRO BACA, Warden, JAMES COX and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MAX REED II
Kevin Lisle v. E. McDaniels, et al
as 13-16921
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KEVIN JAMES LISLE
Defendant - Appellee:
E. K. MCDANIELS, RENEE BAKER, DEBRA BROOKS and others
Gilbert Paliotta v. Eldon McDaniel, et al
as 12-15450
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GILBERT JAY PALIOTTA
Defendant - Appellee:
ELDON K. MCDANIEL, ROBERT SEDLACEK, RUEBEN LAJDA and others
Paliotta v. State of Nevada in rel. The Nevada Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2011cv00121
Defendant:
Brook Adams, Renee Baker, Debra Brooks and others
Plaintiff:
Gilbert Paliotta
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Meeks v. State of Nevada ex rel. Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2010cv00558
Plaintiff:
Andrew L. Meeks, II
Defendant:
Robert Sedlacek, State of Nevada ex rel. Department of Corrections and Drugh Waggener
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Frank Ortiz v. Greg Cox, et al
as 10-16831
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FRANK ORTIZ
Defendant - Appellee:
GREG COX, NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, ANTHONY BARBER and others
Funches v. Thompson et al
as 3:2009cv00343
Plaintiff:
Marritte Funches
Defendant:
Gerald Thompson, Martin Sorenson, James Benedetti and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dennis v. Waggener
as 3:2008cv00416
Plaintiff:
Damien T. Dennis
Defendant:
Drugh Waggener
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Ortiz v. Barber et al
as 3:2007cv00101
Plaintiff:
Frank Ortiz
Defendant:
Anthony Barber, Debra Brooks, JAMES G. COX and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
