Cases 41 - 50 of 278
DUKES v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv40884
Plaintiff:
ROBBIE DUKES
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DUKES v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv35032
Plaintiff:
TYLER DUKES
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DUKES v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv32221
Plaintiff:
BOBBY DUKES
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DUKES v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv32224
Plaintiff:
LEKENDRICK DUKES
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DUKES JR v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv28217
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
LORENZO EUGENE DUKES JR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DUKES v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv26394
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
NICOLE DUKES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DUKES v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv25681
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
TYREE DUANE DUKES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Duke et al v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv03233
Plaintiff:
Craig Duke and Maudie Duke
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DUKE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv20229
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
NICHOLAS DUKE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CLARK v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv19758
Plaintiff:
DUKE DUKE CLARK
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
