Cases 31 - 40 of 43
Zogheib v. Terrell
as 5:2007cv03125
Petitioner:
Jihad Anthony Zogheib
Respondent:
Duke Terrell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Fisher v. Terrell
as 5:2007cv03107
Petitioner:
Harold Leroy Fisher
Respondent:
Duke Terrell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Gonzales v. Terrell
as 5:2007cv03104
Petitioner:
Artemio Gonzales
Respondent:
Duke Terrell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Moreland v. Terrell et al
as 5:2007cv03100
Petitioner:
Anthony Moreland
Respondent:
Duke Terrell and Roberto Gonzales
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Schmidt v. Terrell et al
as 5:2007cv03089
Petitioner:
Robert Gustov Schmidt
Respondent:
Duke Terrell and State of Michigan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
McCall v. United States of America et al
as 5:2007cv03087
Plaintiff:
Gregory Lee McCall
Defendant:
United States of America, Federal Bureau of Prisons, Duke Terrell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Hill v. Terrell et al
as 5:2007cv03082
Plaintiff:
Billy Joe Hill
Defendant:
Duke Terrell and Harley G Lappin
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Adams v. Terrell et al
as 5:2007cv03081
Petitioner:
Robert Clarence Adams
Respondent:
Duke Terrell, (fnu) Booth, (fnu) Simic and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Flores-Rebollar v. Terrell
as 5:2007cv03069
Petitioner:
Heriberto Flores-Rebollar
Respondent:
Duke Terrell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Johnson v. Terrell
as 5:2007cv03053
Petitioner:
Anthony Johnson
Respondent:
Duke Terrell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
