Cases 11 - 20 of 29
BROOKSv. GOODYEAR TIRE AND RUBBER COMPANY
as 2:2009cv93787
Plaintiff:
CHARLES E. BROOKS
Defendant:
GOODYEAR TIRE AND RUBBER COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
BROOKS v. H. B. FULLER COMPANY
as 2:2009cv93907
Plaintiff:
CHARLES E. BROOKS
Defendant:
H. B. FULLER COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
BROOKS v. AMERICAN OPTICAL CORPORATION
as 2:2009cv93804
Plaintiff:
CHARLES E. BROOKS
Defendant:
AMERICAN OPTICAL CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
BROOKS v. CONGOLEUM CORPORATION
as 2:2009cv93868
Plaintiff:
CHARLES E. BROOKS
Defendant:
CONGOLEUM CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
BROOKS v. CERTAINTEED CORPORATION
as 2:2009cv92891
Plaintiff:
CHARLES E. BROOKS
Defendant:
CERTAINTEED CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
BROOKS v. NATIONAL SERVICE INDUSTRIES, INC.
as 2:2009cv92924
Plaintiff:
CHARLES E. BROOKS
Defendant:
NATIONAL SERVICE INDUSTRIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
BROOKS v. WEIL-MCLAIN COMPANY, INC.
as 2:2009cv92817
Plaintiff:
CHARLES E. BROOKS
Defendant:
WEIL-MCLAIN COMPANY, INC. and WEIL-MCLAIN COMPANY, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
BROOKS v. GOULD PUMPS, INC.
as 2:2009cv92872
Plaintiff:
CHARLES E. BROOKS
Defendant:
GOULD PUMPS, INC. and GOULD PUMPS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
BROOKS v. UNION CARBIDE CHEMICALS & PLASTICS CO INC
as 2:2009cv92850
Plaintiff:
CHARLES E. BROOKS
Defendant:
UNION CARBIDE CHEMICALS & PLASTICS CO INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
BROOKS v. CBS CORPORATION
as 2:2009cv92985
Plaintiff:
CHARLES E. BROOKS
Defendant:
CBS CORPORATION and CBS CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
