Cases 31 - 40 of 663
Tolliver et al v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as WVS/2:16-cv-00521
Plaintiff:
Richard Travis Tolliver and Erin F. Tolliver
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Wolfe v. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours and Company
as WVS/2:16-cv-00516
Plaintiff:
Sheryl Wolfe
Defendant:
E. I. Du Pont De Nemours and Company
Pierson v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as WVS/2:16-cv-02322
Plaintiff:
Linda L. Pierson
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Adkins v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as WVS/2:16-cv-01140
Plaintiff:
Earl Adkins, Sr.
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Wolfe v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as WVS/2:16-cv-00518
Plaintiff:
Bryan Wolfe
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Amick v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as WVS/2:16-cv-00616
Plaintiff:
Timothy Amick
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
McClure v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as WVS/2:16-cv-00523
Plaintiff:
Robert Joseph McClure
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Clemons et al v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as WVS/2:16-cv-00615
Plaintiff:
Jewell A. Clemons and Gregory S. Clemons
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Strader et al v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as WVS/2:16-cv-00517
Plaintiff:
Joan Strader and Sal Strader
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Americans for Clean Energy, et al v. EPA, et al
as 16-1005
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency, E. Scott Pruitt, Administrator and Regina A. McCarthy, Administrator
Intervenor:
American Petroleum Institute, E.I. du Pont de Nemours and Company, U.S. Oil & Refining Co. and others
Amicus Curiae:
Canola Council of Canada, Small Retailers Coalition, Arvegenix, Inc. and others
Petitioner:
National Sorghum Producers, Growth Energy, National Corn Growers Association and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
