Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Smith v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02592
Plaintiff:
James E. Smith, III
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Smith v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00197
Plaintiff:
Kasie E. Smith
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Smith et al v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv02488
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Raymond E. Smith and Holly Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith et al v. Davol, Inc./C.R. Bard, Inc. Polypropylene Hernia Mesh Products Liability Litigation
as 2:2020cv00887
Plaintiff:
Suzanne E. Smith and Todd Smith
Defendant:
Davol, Inc./C.R. Bard, Inc. Polypropylene Hernia Mesh Products Liability Litigation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv03205
Plaintiff:
Kevin E. Smith
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv00429
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
William E. Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 1:2013dp20551
Plaintiff:
Fern E. Smith
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. , DePuy, Inc. , DePuy International Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Smith v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 1:2012dp20865
Plaintiff:
Linda E. Smith
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. , DePuy, Inc. , DePuy International Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith et al v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 1:2012dp20321
Plaintiff:
Gwendolyn M Smith and Richard E Smith
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. , DePuy, Inc. , Johnson & Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith v. DePuy Inc. et al
as 1:2011dp22642
Plaintiff:
Charles E. Smith
Defendant:
DePuy Inc. , Depuy Orthopaedics Inc. , DePuy International Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
