Cases 41 - 47 of 47
DOTSON v. AC&S, INC. et al
as 2:2007cv62801
Plaintiff:
KEITH W. DOTSON, KEITH W. DOTSON and KEITH W. DOTSON
Defendant:
AC&S, INC., MCCORMICK ASBESTOS COMPANY, PORTER HAYDEN COMPANY and others
Amicu:
QUIGLEY COMPANY, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
SHAW v. ACANDS INC et al
as 2:2007cv62783
Plaintiff:
JOHNNIE B. SHAW and JOHNNIE B. SHAW
Defendant:
ACANDS INC, MCCORMICK ASBESTOS CO., HOPEMAN BROTHERS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
WASHINGTON v. ACANDS, INC. et al
as 2:2007cv62792
Plaintiff:
LEONARD I. WASHINGTON and LEONARD I. WASHINGTON
Defendant:
ACANDS, INC., MCCORMICK ASBESTOS CO., HOPEMAN BROTHERS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
MCKENZIE et al v. ACANDS, INC. et al
as 2:2007cv62803
Plaintiff:
NATHANIEL MCKENZIE, NATHANIEL MCKENZIE, NATHANIEL MCKENZIE and others
Defendant:
ACANDS, INC., MCCORMICK ASBESTOS CO., PORTER-HAYDEN CO., INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
VICKERY et al v. AC & S, INC. et al
as 2:2007cv62790
Plaintiff:
ARRY J. VICKERY, ARRY J. VICKERY and UNIROYAL, INC.
Defendant:
AC & S, INC., MCCORMICK ASBESTOS CO., HOPEMAN BROTHERS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
BEATTIE v. AC AND S, INC. et al
as 2:2007cv62810
Plaintiff:
FRANCIS E. BEATTIE, FRANCIS E. BEATTIE and FRANCIS E. BEATTIE
Defendant:
AC AND S, INC., ANCHOR PACKING COMPANY, OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORP. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
WENTWORTH v. OWENS-ILLINOIS GLASS CO. et al
as 2:2007cv62837
Plaintiff:
LEROY WENTWORTH
Defendant:
OWENS-ILLINOIS GLASS CO., GENERAL REFRACTORIES COMPANY, GEORGIA PACIFIC CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
