Cases 11 - 17 of 17
BURKHARDT v. BURKHARDT et al
as 2:2007cv62818
Plaintiff:
DANIEL H BURKHARDT
Defendant:
ELIZABETH J. BURKHARDT, ELIZABETH J. BURKHARDT, ACANDS INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
JACKSON v. JOHN CRANE-HOUDAILE, INC. et al
as 2:2007cv62848
Plaintiff:
LEROY JACKSON, LEROY JACKSON, LEROY JACKSON and others
Defendant:
JOHN CRANE-HOUDAILE, INC., OWENS-ILLIINOIS GLASS CO., E.L. STEBBINGS & CO., INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
MILES v. OWENS-ILLINOIS GLASS CO. et al
as 2:2007cv62861
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM MILES
Defendant:
OWENS-ILLINOIS GLASS CO., OWENS-ILLINOIS GLASS CO., GENERAL REFRACTORIES, CO. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
ADAMSKI et al v. QUIGLEY COMPANY, INC. et al
as 2:2007cv62853
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND T. ADAMSKI and BETTY ADAMSKI
Defendant:
QUIGLEY COMPANY, INC., E.L. STEBBING & CO., INC., HAMPSHIRE INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
BURKHARDT et al v. OWENS-ILLINOIS GLASS CO. et al
as 2:2007cv62845
Plaintiff:
DANIEL H. BURKHARDT, JR. and ELIZABETH BURKHARDT
Defendant:
OWENS-ILLINOIS GLASS CO., OWENS-ILLINOIS GLASS CO., OWENS-ILLINOIS GLASS CO. and others
ThirdParty Defendant:
HOPEMAN BROTHERS, INC., UNIROYAL, INC., SB DECKING INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
BRYL v. OWENS-ILLINOIS GLASS CO. et al
as 2:2007cv62838
Plaintiff:
WALTER BRYL
Defendant:
OWENS-ILLINOIS GLASS CO., OWENS-ILLINOIS GLASS CO., GENERAL REFRACTORIES, CO. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
RAVER v. JOHN CRANE - HOUDAILLE, INC. et al
as 2:2007cv62858
Plaintiff:
MARY R. RAVER, MARY R. RAVER and MARY R. RAVER
Defendant:
JOHN CRANE - HOUDAILLE, INC., OWENS-ILLINOIS GLASS CO., E.L. STEBBING & CO., INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
