Cases 1 - 10 of 28
Jane Doe No. 1-13 v. Nygard et al
as 1:2023cv10306
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe No. 1, Jane Doe No. 2, Jane Doe No. 3 and others
Defendant:
Peter J Nygard, Nygard Inc., Nygard Holdings Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 cv Fed. Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00854
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
UBS Bank USA v. Beans & Vines Corp. et al
as 1:2021cv00802
Plaintiff:
UBS Bank USA
Defendant:
Edson Familia, Beans & Vines Corp. and Beans & Vines Express Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 pm
Rogers v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2020cv00070
Plaintiff:
Charles Edson Rogers, III
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Weintraub v. Presidio, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv05870
Defendant:
Pankaj Patel, Michael Reiss, Todd H. Siegel and others
Plaintiff:
Eric Weintraub
Rice v. Presidio, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv09219
Defendant:
Michael Reiss, Todd H. Siegel, Heather Berger and others
Plaintiff:
Walter Rice
Lin v. Presidio, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv09059
Plaintiff:
Mitsuko K Lin
Defendant:
Pankaj Patel, Bob Cagnazzi, Todd H. Siegel and others
Carrillo et al v. Kay Waterproofing Corp. et al
as 1:2019cv01365
Defendant:
Barry Grummer, Manuel Minnino, Manuela Paz and others
Plaintiff:
Manuel Mesias Chalco Lucero, Percy Prempeh-Mann, Edwin Alejandro Moran Salas and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Aamoth et al v. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
as 1:2018cv12270
Plaintiff:
Sadie Reoch, Maureen Moore, Evelyn Pettignano and others
Defendant:
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2333
Edson v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2018cv00819
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Kelli J. Edson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
