Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Albert Medina v. NDOC, et al
as 21-16606
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ALBERT MEDINA
Defendant / Appellee:
NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, ELY STATE PRISON WARDEN, D. DRUMMOND and others
Medina v. NDOC Director et al
as 3:2021cv00001
Defendant:
William Gittere, James Dzuerda, Rivera and others
Plaintiff:
Albert Medina
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
David Thiessen v. Ely State Prison, et al
as 20-15541
Respondent / Appellee:
ELY STATE PRISON, Warden and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF NEVADA
Petitioner / Appellant:
DAVID CULLEN THIESSEN
Iden v. Davis et al
as 3:2020cv00152
Defendant:
Unknown officer 2, Davis, Ely State Prison Warden and others
Plaintiff:
Richard Iden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brooks v. Davis et al
as 3:2020cv00150
Defendant:
Davis and Ely State Prison Warden
Plaintiff:
Anthony Brooks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brooks v. Alzate et al
as 3:2020cv00135
Defendant:
Ely State Prison Mailroom Supervisor, Ely State Prison Warden, Alzate and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony Brooks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thiessen v. Warden, Ely State Prison, NV et al
as 3:2020cv00128
Respondent:
Ely State Prison Warden
Petitioner:
David Cullen Thiessen
Defendant:
Nevada Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Iden v. Alzate et al
as 3:2020cv00127
Plaintiff:
Richard Iden
Defendant:
Ely State Prison Mailroom Supervisor, A. Alzate and Ely State Prison Warden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Martinez v. Nevada Attorney General, et al
as 3:2018cv00044
Respondent:
Ely State Prison Warden and Nevada Attorney General
Petitioner:
David M. Martinez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Edwards v. Leavitt et al
as 3:2017cv00147
Defendant:
Dashain, Michael Dilorenzo, Noreen Dumonte and others
Plaintiff:
Carl D. Edwards
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
