Cases 31 - 40 of 90
Shockley v. EMC Mortgage Corporation et al
as 4:2011cv00162
Plaintiff:
Charlene Shockley
Defendant:
EMC Mortgage Corporation, Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc., Home Banc Mortgage Corporation and others
James v. EMC Mortgage Corporation
as 1:2011cv01392
Plaintiff:
Stephen A. James, Jr.
Defendant:
EMC Mortgage Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Kalpak et al v. EMC Mortgage Corporation
as 3:2011cv00049
Plaintiff:
Ara F Kalpak and Dolores F Kalpak
Defendant:
EMC Mortgage Corporation
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 191
Lewis et al v. EMC Mortgage Corporation et al
as 1:2011cv00963
Plaintiff:
Virginia L. Lewis and Michael Lewis
Defendant:
EMC Mortgage Corporation and U.S. Bank National Association
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1691
Law Office of David J. Stern, P.A. v. Chase Home Finance LLC
as 1:2011cv21039
Plaintiff:
Law Office of David J. Stern, P.A.
Defendant:
Chase Home Finance LLC
Counter_claimant:
EMC Mortgage Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Brundage v. EMC Mortgage Corporation
as 1:2011cv00750
Plaintiff:
Carrie M. Brundage
Defendant:
EMC Mortgage Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Gaddis v. McCalla Raymer, LLC et al
as 1:2011cv00654
Plaintiff:
Christopher Gaddis
Defendant:
McCalla Raymer, LLC , JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A. , US Bank National Association and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444
Bruno v. U.S. Bank N.A. et al
as 1:2011cv00590
Plaintiff:
Salvador Bruno
Defendant:
U.S. Bank N.A. and EMC Mortgage Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444
Jones v. The Bank of New York Mellon et al
as 3:2011cv00018
Plaintiff:
Donald G. Jones
Defendant:
The Bank of New York Mellon and EMC Mortgage Corporation, et al
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444
Redd et al v. EMC Mortgage Corporation
as 4:2011cv00016
Plaintiff:
John Redd, Jr. and Mercedes Cisneros
Defendant:
EMC Mortgage Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
