Cases 1 - 7 of 7
STIPE et al v. SAGAN et al
as 3:2017mc00001
Movant:
JOHN MICHAEL STIPE
Plaintiff:
ABKCO MUSIC INC , COLGEMS-EMI MUSIC INC , EMI ALGEE MUSIC CORP and others
Defendant:
WILLIAM SAGAN , NORTON LLC and BILL GRAHAM ARCHIVES LLC
Cause Of Action: Motion to Quash
BROADCAST MUSIC INC et al v. STANVIC ENTERTAINMENT LLC et al
as 5:2016cv00124
Plaintiff:
BROADCAST MUSIC INC , SONY/ATV SONGS LLC , WELSH WITCH MUSIC and others
Defendant:
STANVIC ENTERTAINMENT LLC and TIM OBELGONER
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
BROADCAST MUSIC INC et al v. GROOVER
as 7:2016cv00011
Plaintiff:
BROADCAST MUSIC INC , WARNER-TAMERLANE PUBLISHING CORP , SONY/ATV SONGS LLC and others
Defendant:
JAMES GROOVER
Counter_claimant:
JAMES GROOVER
Counter_defendant:
2 PLAYAS PUBLISHING LLC , AVERAGE JOE'S ENTERTAINMENT GROUP LLC , BOCEPHUS MUSIC INC and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
BROADCAST MUSIC INC et al v. OVER TYME BAR AND GRILL INC et al
as 5:2015cv00398
Plaintiff:
BROADCAST MUSIC INC , AMAZEMENT MUSIC , SEASONS FOUR MUSIC and others
Defendant:
OVER TYME BAR AND GRILL INC, CHARITY HARRIS and LARRY HARRIS
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
BROADCAST MUSIC INC et al v. SCRUFFY MURPHY'S INC et al
as 4:2015cv00018
Plaintiff:
BROADCAST MUSIC INC , MJ PUBLISHING TRUST , HOUSE OF CASH INC and others
Defendant:
SCRUFFY MURPHY'S INC and BREDA H GLEESON
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
BROADCAST MUSIC INC et al v. BTG OF GEORGIA INC et al
as 5:2011cv00485
Plaintiff:
BROADCAST MUSIC INC , MJ PUBLISHING TRUST , BOCEPHUS MUSIC INC and others
Defendant:
BTG OF GEORGIA INC, ROBERT L BAILEY, GREGORY J WELFORD and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Broadcast Music, Inc. et al v. Shakerz LLC et al
as 3:2009cv00067
Plaintiff:
Broadcast Music, Inc., Broadcast Music, Inc., Fantasy Inc and others
Defendant:
Shakerz LLC and Sheri M Maddox
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
