Cases 1 - 10 of 59
HANDEL et al v. FITZGERALD et al
as 2:2009cv01678
Plaintiff:
YURIEL HANDEL and SOKHEMARA CHHIV
Defendant:
KAREN FITZGERALD, EVANGELIA KLAPAKIS, DIRECTOR and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
LIU v. CHERTOFF et al
as 2:2008cv04573
Plaintiff:
DE QI LIU
Defendant:
MICHAEL CHERTOFF and EMILIO T. GONZALEZ
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv01713
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
SALEH v. CHERTOFF et al
as 2:2008cv04134
Plaintiff:
WISSAM SALEH
Defendant:
MICHAEL CHERTOFF, EMILIO T. GONZALEZ and EVANGELIA KLAPAKIS
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
DOMINGUEZ v. CHERTOFF et al
as 2:2008cv04142
Plaintiff:
CARLOS A. DOMINGUEZ
Defendant:
MICHAEL CHERTOFF, MICHAEL MUKASEY, EMILIO T. GONZALEZ and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
MA v. CHETOFF et al
as 2:2008cv03160
Plaintiff:
SHUWEI MA
Defendant:
MICHAEL CHETOFF, MICHAEL MUKASEY, EMILIO T. GONZALEZ and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
SANTOS et al v. CHERTOFF et al
as 2:2008cv02801
Plaintiff:
VIVIANE DE SANTANA SANTOS and GUILHERME SANTANA SANTOS
Defendant:
MICHAEL CHERTOFF, MICHAEL MUKASEY, EMILIO T. GONZALEZ and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
GU v. MUKASEY et al
as 2:2008cv02245
Plaintiff:
SHIQIANG GU
Defendant:
MICHAEL MUKASEY, MICHAEL CHERTOFF, EMILIO T. GONZALEZ and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
MIAN v. CHERTOFF et al
as 2:2008cv01476
Plaintiff:
RAHEELA GHAZANFAR MIAN
Defendant:
MICHAEL CHERTOFF, EMILIO T. GONZALEZ, EVANGELIA KLAPAKIS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
USMAN v. UPCHURCH et al
as 2:2008cv01443
Plaintiff:
MOHAMMED HARIS UMER USMAN
Defendant:
EVELYN UPCHURCH, MICHAEL B. MUKASEY, ROBERT S. MUELLER, III and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
