Cases 11 - 18 of 18
Haywood County v. Amerisourcebergen Drug Coropration et al
as 2:2018cv02016
Plaintiff:
Haywood County
Defendant:
Amerisourcebergen Drug Coropration, Cardinal Health, Inc., McKesson Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Geralds et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv02627
Plaintiff:
Mary A. Geralds and William D. Geralds
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc. and Endo Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
METCALF et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv02625
Plaintiff:
WANDA METCALF , REBECCA RICKLEY and BRUCE RICKLEY
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc., American Medical Systems Holdings, Inc., Endo Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gross et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 1:2012cv01157
Plaintiff:
Theresa Gross , Joyce Heffernan , Leigh Leal and others
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson, Ethicon, Inc., ETHICON SARL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sexton v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv02572
Plaintiff:
Ruth N. Sexton
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon Women's Health and Urology, Gynecare and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Anderson et al v. Rettig et al.
as 2:2012cv02560
Plaintiff:
MARGIE ANDERSON , HAZEL RETTIG , DEBRA CHAPMAN and others
Defendant:
AMERICAN MEDICAL SYSTEMS, INC., AMERICAN MEDICAL SYSTEMS, HOLDINGS, INC., ENDO PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jackson v. American Medical Systems, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv02245
Plaintiff:
Sheila Jackson
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc., American Medical Systems Holdings, Inc., Endo Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cathey Holland v. Eli Lilly And Company et al
as 1:2011cv01352
Defendant:
Eli Lilly And Company, aaiPharma, Inc., aaiPharma LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
