Cases 1 - 10 of 111
BARTOLI v. HOLDER et al
as 1:2021cv02195
Plaintiff:
ERIC BARTOLI
Defendant:
ERIC HOLDER, JEFFERY M. OLSON, JOHN R. ADAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MILLER v. NORTH CHICAGO POLICE DEPT. et al
as 1:2020cv01107
Respondent:
NORTHERN DIST. OF ILLINOIS LAKE COUNTY COURTHOUSE, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, NORTH CHICAGO POLICE DEPT. and others
Petitioner:
SHARIFF MILLER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
CLERVRAIN v. HOLDER et al
as 1:2019cv00890
Defendant:
ERIC HOLDER, JEFF SESSIONS and LORETTA LYNCH
Plaintiff:
MANETIRONY CLERVRAIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv01488
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv01485
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
MORRIS v. UNITED STATES SENTENCING COMMISSION et al
as 1:2013cv01387
Plaintiff:
JAMES ALLEN MORRIS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES SENTENCING COMMISSION, ERIC HOLDER, FELICIA ADAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JENNINGS v. HOLDER
as 1:2013cv00787
Petitioner:
KEITH JENNINGS
Respondent:
ERIC HOLDER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
BUSSIE v. TREASURY DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2013cv00661
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY BUSSIE
Defendant:
TREASURY DEPARTMENT, GARY LOCKE, SENATOR - MINORITY LEADER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv01813
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
JOHNSON v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE et al
as 1:2012cv01773
Plaintiff:
DERRICK JOHNSON
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and ERIC HOLDER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
