Cases 1 - 10 of 50
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00311
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00297
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv60980
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv24770
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2023cv02183
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2023cv00924
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Tusha v. E2Company et al
as 2:2023cv00042
Plaintiff:
Simon Tusha
Defendant:
E2Company, James Richmond, Jeanne Richmond and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2022cv01787
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
K.H. v. ESA P Portfolio Operating Lessee LLC et al
as 3:2022cv01050
Plaintiff:
K. H.
Defendant:
ESA P Portfolio Operating Lessee, LLC, HVM, LLC, ESA Management, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Diamond Resorts International, Inc. et al v. US Consumer Attorneys, P.A.
as 9:2018cv80311
Plaintiff:
DIAMOND RESORTS CORPORATION, DIAMOND RESORTS U.S. COLLECTION DEVELOPMENT, LLC, DIAMOND RESORTS MANAGEMENT, INC. and others
Defendant:
US CONSUMER ATTORNEYS, P.A., Newton Group Exit, LLC, 1PLANETMEDIA INC. and others
Special Master:
Ursula Ungaro
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Trademark Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
