Cases 1 - 10 of 65
Hood v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 6:2020cv00259
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Plaintiff:
Eudene Hood
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 6:2020cv00222
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
Plaintiff:
J. Harold Smith and Mary Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sexton v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 5:2020cv00282
Plaintiff:
Chastity Sexton
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ashbrook v. Ethicon, Inc.
as 6:2020cv00140
Plaintiff:
James Ashbrook and Iretta Lynn Ashbrook
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Burton et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 5:2020cv00280
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Burton and Rebecca Burton
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Fields et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 2:2020cv00086
Defendant:
Ethicon Women's Health and Urology, John Doe Corporations 1-50, Johnson & Johnson and others
Plaintiff:
Don Fields and Janice Fields
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mitchell et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 5:2020cv00157
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Plaintiff:
Arthur Mitchell and Nora Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Grimme et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv00031
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
Plaintiff:
Kathleen Grimme and James Grimme
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Thacker v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 5:2020cv00050
Defendant:
Ethicon Women's Health and Urology, Johnson & Johnson, Gynecare and others
Plaintiff:
Connie J. Thacker and Connie Thacker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jackson et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 3:2020cv00010
Defendant:
Ethicon Women's Health and Urology, Johnson & Johnson, Gynecare and others
Plaintiff:
Bryon Jackson and Tammy Jackson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
