Cases 71 - 80 of 151
States et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 5:2014cv00702
Plaintiff:
Michelle States and Johnnie Harper
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson and Ethicon Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Anderson v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 5:2014cv00693
Plaintiff:
Teresa Marie Anderson
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson and Ethicon Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Allbritton v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 5:2014cv00692
Plaintiff:
Sarah Ruth Allbritton
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson and Ethicon Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Iardella et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 1:2014cv00408
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson , Ethicon, Inc. and Ethicon, LLC
Plaintiff:
Angelique Iardella and Anthony Iardella
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Davis v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 2:2014cv02130
Plaintiff:
Brenda J Davis
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson , Ethicon, Inc. and Ethicon LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
States, et al v. Johnson & Johnson, et al
as 13-6288
Plaintiff - Appellee:
KIM DARNALL, DEBBILYNN DAVILA, JAMIE DAVIS and others
Defendant - Appellant:
ETHICON, INC. and JOHNSON & JOHNSON
Allbritton, et al v. Johnson & Johnson, et al
as 13-6297
Plaintiff - Appellee:
SARAH RUTH ALLBRITTON, WARREN BELL, EVELYN BROWNLEE and others
Defendant - Appellant:
ETHICON, INC. and JOHNSON & JOHNSON
Halliburton, et al v. Johnson & Johnson, et al
as 13-6296
Plaintiff - Appellee:
LARRY JOHN COZART, R JUDITH DEMCHAK, BRADLEY DEMCHAK and others
Defendant - Appellant:
ETHICON, INC. and JOHNSON & JOHNSON
Wade, et al v. Johnson & Johnson, et al
as 13-6292
Plaintiff - Appellee:
MONA SWOFFORD, CRUZE TALAVERSA, SHIRLEY TANNER and others
Defendant - Appellant:
ETHICON, INC. and JOHNSON & JOHNSON
Teague, et al v. Johnson & Johnson, et al
as 13-6287
Plaintiff - Appellee:
VICKIE SCHMIDT PARSON, PATRICIA SCALES, SEAWILLOW SCHMIDT and others
Defendant - Appellant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON and ETHICON, INC.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
