Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Easley v. Trump et al
as 5:2022cv02344
Plaintiff:
Gary D Easley
Defendant:
Donald J. Trump, Joseph Biden, Lucy Koh and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Easley v. State of California, et al
as 5:2021cv00893
Defendant:
Greyhound Bus Company, Donald Trump, Katarina Pena and others
Plaintiff:
Gary D Easley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Lisa Nicholas et al v. Easley, LLC et al
as 8:2020cv01193
Plaintiff:
Lisa Silvia Nicholas and Bobby Groffo
Defendant:
Easley, LLC, Does 1 through 100, inclusive, Crecencio Romero Rodriguez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Davillier et al v. Gilead Sciences, Inc.
as 4:2020cv00570
Plaintiff:
Leonard Easley, Joseph Allen Hays, Bernard Kevin Miller and others
Defendant:
Gilead Sciences, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Arnold et al v. Bristol-Myers Squibb Company et al
as 3:2012cv06426
Plaintiff:
Michael A. Arnold , Vicky Arnold , David E. Bowles and others
Defendant:
Bristol-Myers Squibb Company and McKesson Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Deuna Brown et al v. McKesson Corporation et al
as 2:2012cv09977
Defendant:
AAI Development Services Inc, AAIPharma Inc, AAIPharma LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Deuna Brown, Jean Cooper, Stephanie Coplen and others
Patricia Easley v. Biomet Orthopedics LLC et al
as 5:2012cv01946
Defendant:
Biomet Inc, Biomet LLC and Biomet Orthopedics LLC
Plaintiff:
Patricia Easley
Adams v. Easley et al
as 2:2011cv00913
Plaintiff:
Tyrone L. Adams
Defendant:
Charles L. Easley, Andrew J. Paulson, CGLS Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Adams v. Easley et al
as 2:2011cv00826
Plaintiff:
Tyrone L Adams
Defendant:
Charles L Easley, Andrew J Paulson, CGLS Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Adams v. Easley et al
as 4:2011cv01219
Plaintiff:
Tyrone L. Adams
Defendant:
Charles L. Easley, Andrew J. Paulson, Etal and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
