Cases 11 - 20 of 74
American Family Connect Property and Casualty Insurance Company et al v. Southern California Edison Company et al
as 2:2021cv05132
Plaintiff:
Federated Mutual Insurance Company, Homesite Insurance Company of California, Kemper Independence Insurance and others
Defendant:
Southern California Edison Company, Does 1-50, inclusive and Edison International
Petitioner:
American Modern Home Insurance Company, -, American Modern Property and Casualty Insurance Company and American Alternative Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Glen Barnes, et al v. Edison International, et al
as 21-55589
Defendant / Appellee:
SCE TRUST VI, PNC CAPITAL MARKETS, LLC, U.S. BANCORP INVESTMENTS, INC. and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
IRON WORKERS LOCAL 580 JOINT FUNDS and IRVING LICHTMAN, on behalf of the Irving Lichtman Revocable Living Trust
Plaintiff:
GLEN BARNES, Individually and On Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated
Samar Abdelghany et al v. Southern California Edison Company et al
as 8:2021cv00804
Defendant:
Southern California Edison Company, Edison International, T-Mobile, USA Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Carl Ong, Margaret Burgardt, Steven Tuck and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Samar Abdelghany et al v. Southern California Edison Company et al
as 2:2021cv03492
Defendant:
Southern California Edison Company, Edison International, T-Mobile, USA Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Carl Ong, Margaret Burgardt, Steven Tuck and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Canopius US Insurance, Inc. v. Southern California Edison Company et al
as 2:2020cv00592
Defendant:
Southern California Edison Company, Does 1-50, inclusive, The Boeing Company and others
Plaintiff:
Canopius US Insurance, Inc. as subrogee of Anil Guram, Mohammed Abu-Gheida, Elliot Glusker, Tracey Birdsall, Adam Peters and Brian and Peggy Moreno
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Certain Underwriters at Lloyds, London Subscribing to Policy No. BHX000765B v. Southern California Edison Company et al
as 2:2020cv00582
Defendant:
Southern California Edison Company, The Boeing Company and Edison International
Plaintiff:
Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's, London Subscribing to Policy No. BHX000765B as subrogees of Mehdi Bolour and Yassaman Bolour
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Great Lakes Insurance SE et al v. Southern California Edison Company et al
as 2:2020cv00606
Defendant:
DOES 1-50, Inclusive,, The Boeing Company, Southern California Edison Company, - and others
Plaintiff:
Great Lakes Insurance SE and Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's, London Subscribing to Policy Nos. BQS001024B AND BQS001016C as subrogees of STK and Sons, LLC and EB33740, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Certain Underwriters at Lloyds, London Subscribing to Policy No. LSI 300086-01 v. Southern California Edison Company et al
as 2:2020cv00603
Defendant:
Southern California Edison Company, DOES 1 through 50, inclusive., The Boeing Company and others
Plaintiff:
Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's, London Subscribing to Policy No. LSI 300086-01 as subrogees of Naseem Ahmed
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's, London Subscribing to Policy Nos. LSI 200432 AND LSI 300125 as subrogees of Timothy and Joanna McPartlin and Makan Delrahim v. Southern California Edison Company et al
as 2:2020cv00597
Defendant:
Southern California Edison Company, The Boeing Company, Edison International and others
Plaintiff:
Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's, London Subscribing to Policy Nos. LSI 200432 AND LSI 300125 as subrogees of Timothy and Joanna McPartlin and Makan Delrahim
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1358
Certain Underwriters at Lloyds, London Subscribing to Policy No. BHX000907 v. Southern California Edison Company et al
as 2:2020cv00589
Defendant:
Southern California Edison Company, The Boeing Company, Edison International and others
Plaintiff:
Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's, London Subscribing to Policy No. BHX000907 as subrogees of the Leonard Family Trust
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
