Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Pauma Band of Luiseno Mission Indians of the Pauma & Yuima Reservation v. Unite Here International Union et al
as 3:2016cv02660
Plaintiff:
Pauma Band of Luiseno Mission Indians of the Pauma & Yuima Reservation
Defendant:
Unite Here International Union , California, State of and Edmund G. Brown, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 25 U.S.C. § 2701
Pauma Band of Luiseno Mission Indians of the Pauma & Yuima Reservation v. California, State of et al
as 3:2016cv01713
Plaintiff:
Pauma Band of Luiseno Mission Indians of the Pauma & Yuima Reservation
Defendant:
California, State of and Edmund G. Brown, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 25 U.S.C. § 2701
Pauma Band of Luiseno Mission v. State of California, et al
as 14-56104
Plaintiff - Appellee:
PAUMA BAND OF LUISENO MISSION INDIANS OF THE PAUMA & YUIMA RESERVATION, AKA Pauma Band of Mission Indians, AKA Pauma Luiseno Band of Misasion Indians
Defendant - Appellant:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, CALIFORNIA GAMBLING CONTROL COMMISSION, an agency of the State of California and EDMUND G. BROWN, Jr., as Governor of the State of California
Pauma Band of Luiseno Mission v. State of California, et al
as 14-56105
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PAUMA BAND OF LUISENO MISSION INDIANS OF THE PAUMA & YUIMA RESERVATION, AKA Pauma Band of Mission Indians, AKA Pauma Luiseno Band of Misasion Indians
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, CALIFORNIA GAMBLING CONTROL COMMISSION, an agency of the State of California and EDMUND G. BROWN, Jr., as Governor of the State of California
Dean v. Brown et al
as 2:2012cv00167
Plaintiff:
Michael Dean
Defendant:
Edmund G. Brown, Jr. and State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
City of Temecula et al v. Pechanga Band of Luiseno Indians
as 2:2010cv07378
Real Party In Interest Defendant:
Edmund G. Brown, Jr., California Gambling Control Commission, Roes and others
Plaintiff:
City of Temecula
Defendant:
Pechanga Band of Luiseno Indians
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
