Cases 1 - 10 of 28
Poulin v. Kijakazi
as 3:2023cv01471
Plaintiff:
Edward T. Poulin
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Sapko v. Kijakazi
as 3:2023cv01221
Plaintiff:
Mark Edward Sapko
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 dc Review of SSA Decision SSDC - Concurrent Title II and Title XVI Claims
Broadbent v. Kijakazi
as 3:2021cv01716
Plaintiff:
Edward Broadbent
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi and Andrew M. Saul
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of SSA Decision SSID - SSI Disability Cases
Zinkewich v. Saul
as 3:2020cv01824
Defendant:
Andrew Saul, Commissioner of Social Security and Andrew Saul
Plaintiff:
Edward D. Zinkewich
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 dc
Howarth v. Berryhill
as 3:2019cv00905
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security and Nancy A. Berryhill
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Christopher Edward Howarth
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 dc
Broadbent v. Berryhill
as 3:2018cv02127
Plaintiff:
Edward Broadbent
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Edwards v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2018cv00379
Plaintiff:
Felicia Edwards
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Matteo v. Berryhill
as 3:2017cv01821
Plaintiff:
Bruce Edward Matteo
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Dudko v. Berryhill
as 3:2017cv01535
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Plaintiff:
Edward Dudko
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Edwards v. Berryhill
as 3:2017cv00298
Plaintiff:
Bonnie R. Edwards
Defendant:
Nancy E. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
