Cases 1 - 10 of 60
Mosbah et al v. Mueller et al
as 3:2009cv03337
Plaintiff:
Ed Mosbah and Lynn Mari
Defendant:
Robert Mueller, III, Emilio Gonzales, Johnathan Scharfen and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2008cv00873
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1447 Denial of Application for Naturalization Hearing
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2008cv02521
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2008cv01196
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Metehau vs. Mueller III, et al.
as 2:2008cv00417
Plaintiff:
Danut S Metehau
Defendant:
Robert Mueller, III, Emilio Gonzales, Michael Chertoff and others
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Saffarpour v. Chertoff et al
as 3:2008cv00925
Plaintiff:
Arash Saffarpour
Defendant:
Michael Chertoff, Emilio Gonzales and David Still
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Mahvesh Shakir v. Michael Chertoff et al
as 2:2008cv00754
Plaintiff:
Mahvesh Shakir
Defendant:
Michael Chertoff, Emilio Gonzales, Jane Arellano and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2008cv00481
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Application for Naturalization
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2008cv00345
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing
Kaur v. Mueller et al
as 1:2008cv00071
Plaintiff:
Jaswinder Kaur
Defendant:
Robert Mueller, III, Michael Chertoff, Emilio Gonzales and others
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
