Cases 1 - 10 of 37
Cipolla v. Encore Receivable Management, Inc.
as 0:2018cv62007
Defendant:
Encore Receivable Management, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Patricia Cipolla
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Rucker et al v. Encore Receivable Management, Inc.
as 2:2018cv00525
Plaintiff:
Steven Rucker and Angela King
Defendant:
Encore Receivable Management, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Restrictions on Use of Telephone Equipment
Nicholson v. Encore Receivable Management, Inc.
as 2:2018cv00035
Plaintiff:
Stella Nicholson
Defendant:
Encore Receivable Management, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Restrictions on Use of Telephone Equipment
Randolph v. Encore Receivable Management, Inc.
as 8:2017cv00816
Plaintiff:
Brian Randolph
Defendant:
Encore Receivable Management, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Restrictions on Use of Telephone Equipment
Parish v. Synchrony Bank et al
as 3:2016cv01548
Plaintiff:
Gregory Parish
Defendant:
Synchrony Bank and Encore Receivable Management, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Restrictions on Use of Telephone Equipment
Williams et al v. Encore Receivable Management, Inc.
as 3:2016cv00433
Plaintiff:
Kimberlee Williams , Brenda Torres and Kenneth Renfrow
Defendant:
Encore Receivable Management, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv01007
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2014cv00240
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2012cv00023
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Dumas v. Encore Receivable Management, Inc.
as 2:2011cv00182
Plaintiff:
Raymond Dumas
Defendant:
Encore Receivable Management, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
