Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Migrant Clinicians Network, et al v. USEPA, et al
as 21-70719
Petitioner:
CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY, NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL, FARMWORKER JUSTICE and others
Respondent:
U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY and MICHAEL REGAN, in his official capacity as Administrator of the United States Environmental Protection Agency
Sierra Club, et al v. DOT, et al
as 20-1317
Respondent:
Howard R. Elliott, in his official capacity as Administrator of Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration, United States of America, Elaine L. Chao, in her official capacity as Secretary of U.S. Department of Transportation and others
Petitioner:
Center for Biological Diversity, Delaware Riverkeeper Network, Environmental Confederation of Southwest Florida and others
Sierra Club et al v. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service et al
as 2:2020cv00013
Defendant:
U.S. Army Corp of Engineers, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Florida Department of Transportation and others
Plaintiff:
Environmental Confederation of Southwest Florida and Sierra Club
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 1538
Florida Wildlife Federation In, et al v. United States Army Corps of En, et al
as 14-13392
Plaintiff - Appellant-Cross Appellee:
FLORIDA WILDLIFE FEDERATION INC, ENVIRONMENTAL CONFEDERATION OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA INC. and CONSERVANCY OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA INC.
Defendant - Appellee-Cross Appellant:
SOUTH FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS and FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
Florida Wildlife Federation In, et al v. South Florida Water Management
as 14-13393
Plaintiff - Appellee:
FLORIDA WILDLIFE FEDERATION INC, ENVIRONMENTAL CONFEDERATION OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA, INC. and CONSERVANCY OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA, INC.
Defendant - Appellant:
SOUTH FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT
Florida Wildlife Federation In, et al v. Administrator, U.S. Environmen, et al
as 14-10987
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FLORIDA WILDLIFE FEDERATION INC, SIERRA CLUB, INC., ENVIRONMENTAL CONFEDERATION OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA, INC. and others
Defendant - Appellee:
ADMINISTRATOR, U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY and U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
:
SERVICE
Florida Wildlife Federation, I, et al v. South Florida Water Management
as 13-10764
Plaintiff - Appellee:
FLORIDA WILDLIFE FEDERATION, INC., ENVIRONMENTAL CONFEDERATION OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA, INC. and CONSERVANCY OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA, INC.
Defendant - Appellant:
SOUTH FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT
:
SERVICE
FLORIDA WILDLIFE FEDERATION INC et al v. UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS et al
as 4:2012cv00355
Plaintiff:
FLORIDA WILDLIFE FEDERATION INC , ENVIRONMENTAL CONFEDERATION OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA INC and CONSERVANCY OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA INC
Defendant:
UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS , SOUTH FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT and FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1365
Gulf Restoration Network, Inc., et al v. Administrator, U.S. Environmen, et al
as 12-12119
Plaintiff / Appellant:
FLORIDA ELECTRIC POWER COORDINATING GROUP, INC., FLORIDA WATER ENVIRONMENTAL ASSOCIATION UTILITY COUNCIL, CITY OF PANAMA CITY, FLORIDA and others
Not Classified By Court:
SERVICE
Defendant / Appellee:
U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, FLORIDA FERTILIZER & AGRICHEMICAL ASSOCIATION, THE FERTILIZER INSTITUTE and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
FLORIDA WILDLIFE FEDERATION, INC., THE MOSAIC COMPANY, INC., FLORIDA PULP & PAPER ASSOCIATION ENVIRONMENTAL AFFAIRS and others
Amicus Curiae:
FLORIDA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE AND ASSOCIATED INDUSTRIES OF FLORIDA
FLORIDA WILDLIFE FEDERATION INC et al v. UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY et al
as 4:2010cv00511
Plaintiff:
FLORIDA WILDLIFE FEDERATION INC , ST JOHNS RIVERKEEPER INC and ENVIRONMENTAL CONFEDERATION OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA INC
Defendant:
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY and LISA P JACKSON
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
