Cases 1 - 8 of 8
ZAVADA v. THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2012cv02749
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN G. ZAVADA, JR.
Defendant:
THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and ERIC H. HOLDER, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
CONLON et al v. HOLDER et al
as 3:2010cv04291
Plaintiff:
STEVEN G. CONLON and NUNU BAKURADZE
Defendant:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., JANET ANN NAPOLITANO, ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv03802
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1252
SONMEZ v. HOLDER et al
as 2:2009cv04138
Plaintiff:
MAHMUT SONMEZ
Defendant:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR. and KIM ZANOTTI
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
GONZALEZ v. HOLDER et al
as 2:2009cv03994
Petitioner:
ISRAEL A. CENTENO GONZALEZ
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., MICHAEL CHERTOFF, THE UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES ("USCIS") and others
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing
BARBOUR v. HOLDER et al
as 2:2009cv03062
Plaintiff:
NASSER BARBOUR
Defendant:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., JANET NAPOLITANO, THE UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES ("USCIS") and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv02515
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
INTERACTIVE MEDIA ENTERTAINMENT & GAMING ASSOCIATION, INC. et al v. UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL ERIC H. HOLDER, JR. et al
as 3:2009cv01301
Plaintiff:
INTERACTIVE MEDIA ENTERTAINMENT & GAMING ASSOCIATION, INC., NEW JERSEY THOROUGHBRED HORSEMEN'S ASSOCIATION, INC., THOROUGHBRED BREEDERS ASSOCIATION OF NEW JERSEY and others
Defendant:
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., UNITED STATES ATTORNEY FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY RALPH J. MARRA, JR. and ABC SPORTS ORGANIZATIONS
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
