Cases 41 - 50 of 156
David Wattleton v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 14-5217
Plaintiff - Appellant:
David Earl Wattleton
Defendant - Appellee:
Eric H. Holder, Jr., United States Attorney General
James Morris v. U.S. Sentencing Commission, et al
as 14-5204
Plaintiff - Appellant:
James Morris
Defendant - Appellee:
United States Sentencing Commission, Eric H. Holder, Jr., Attorney General, United States Department of Justice, Felicia Adams, United States Attorney, Northern District of Mississippi and others
MILLER v. HARRIS et al
as 1:2014cv01330
Plaintiff:
THOMAS S. MILLER
Defendant:
SCOTT S. HARRIS, REDMOND K. BARNES and ERIC H. HOLDER, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
GROSS v. HOLDER et al
as 1:2014cv01333
Petitioner:
ANDREW GROSS, III
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR. and CHARLES E. SAMUELS, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Frederick Banks v. CIA, et al
as 14-5189
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Frederick Banks
Defendant - Appellee:
Central Intelligence Agency, Jim Brenan, Director, Office of Science and Technology, Joy Flowers Conti and others
WILLIAMS v. UNITED STATES et al
as 1:2014cv01296
Plaintiff:
DERRICK LAVELL WILLIAMS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES, ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., PROPST and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BANKS v. CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY et al
as 1:2014cv01177
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK BANKS
Defendant:
CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY, JIM BRENAN, JOY FLOWERS CONTI and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
HARVEY v. HOLDER et al
as 1:2014cv00784
Plaintiff:
EDWARD HARVEY
Defendant:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS and OFFICE OF INTERNAL AFFAIRS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WATTLETON v. HOLDER
as 1:2014cv01229
Plaintiff:
DAVID EARL WATTLETON
Defendant:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SHAH v. HOLDER
as 1:2014cv01168
Plaintiff:
VIVEK SHAH
Defendant:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
