Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Kehano v. Harrington et al
as 1:2016cv00589
Plaintiff:
Roland I. Kehano, Sr.
Defendant:
Scott Harrington, Richard Bissen, Jr., Davelynn M. Tengan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Kehano v. Sequeira et al
as 1:2016cv00010
Plaintiff:
Roland I. Kehano, Sr.
Defendant:
Francis X. Sequeira, Richard T. Bissen, Davelynn M. Tengan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kehano v. Sequeira et al
as 1:2016cv00006
Petitioner:
Roland I. Kehano, Sr.
Respondent:
Francis X. Sequeira, Richard T. Bissen, Davelynn M. Tengan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Tia v. City of Aiea Board of Water Supply et al
as 1:2013cv00194
Plaintiff:
Peter R. Tia
Defendant:
City of Aiea Board of Water Supply, Meadow Gold Dairies Inc., Kaiser and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tia v. Victory Ohana Does et al
as 1:2013cv00187
Plaintiff:
Peter R. Tia
Defendant:
Victory Ohana Does, Lyle Antonio, HCF MISHU Floorboy DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tia v. Antonio et al
as 1:2012cv00488
Plaintiff:
Peter R. Tia
Defendant:
Lyle Antonio, Jodie Hirata, Nolan Espinda and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hanohano v. Espinda et al
as 1:2012cv00235
Plaintiff:
Randy Hanohano
Defendant:
Nolan Espinda, Eric Tanaka and Dallen Paleka
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Te'o v. Espinda et al
as 1:2011cv00789
Plaintiff:
Paul Solomon Te'o
Defendant:
Nolan Espinda, Eric Tanaka, Antonio and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Palaita v. Espinda et al
as 1:2011cv00726
Plaintiff:
Matthew David Palaita
Defendant:
Nolan Espinda, Eric Tanaka, Unknown Antonio and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walter Rodenhurst, III v. Kay Bauman, et al
as 11-17032
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WALTER V. RODENHURST, III
Defendant - Appellee:
KAY BAUMAN, M.D., KENNETH ZIENKIEWICZ, M.D., FRANK J. LOPEZ and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
