Other Statutes Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 25
Reinoso-Guzman, et al. v. Garland
as 24-2211
Petitioner: ERICKA JEANETH REINOSO-GUZMAN and ANGIE MILAGROS GARCIA-REINOSO
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Nieto Asencio, et al. v. Garland
as 24-313
Petitioner: ANA JACQUELINE NIETO ASENCIO, ERICKA MICHELLE SOLANO NIETO and EDUARDO EDENILSON SOLANO NIETO
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Diaz-Jimenez, et al. v. Garland
as 22-1785
Petitioner: ANA MARIA DIAZ-JIMENEZ and ERICKA STEFANIA SANCHEZ-DIAZ
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 8:2022cv02145
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Amaya-Castro v. Garland
as 22-464
Petitioner: ERICKA MARIA AMAYA-CASTRO
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2022cv00255
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00200
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Estrada Escalante v. Garland
as 21-828
Petitioner: ERICKA ESTRADA ESCALANTE
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Felix Delgadillo v. Los Angeles County District, et al
as 21-55509
Defendant / Appellee: POST-CONVICTION PRIVATE ATTORNEY H. RUSSELL HALPERN, in individual capacity, DEPUTY PUBLIC DEFENDER ERICKA WILEY, in individual capacity, INGLEWOOD POLICE OFFICER JOSEPH LISARD, in individual capacity and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: FELIX DELGADILLO
Nathaniel Williams v. Darren Spiece, et al
as 21-15800
Defendant / Appellee: SANCHEZ, JOSEPH LEWIS, JERRY HOWELL, Warden and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: NATHANIEL WILLIAMS

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?