Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 61 - 65 of 65
Broadcom Corporation v. Qualcomm Incorporated et al
as 3:2008cv01632
Plaintiff: Broadcom Corporation, Broadcom Corporation and Broadcom Corporation
Defendant: Qualcomm Incorporated, Qualcomm Incorporated, Qualcomm Incorporated and others
Movant: TEXAS INSTRUMENTS INCORPORATED
Respondent: Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson and ERICSSON INC.
Counter Claimant: Qualcomm Incorporated, Qualcomm Incorporated and Qualcomm Incorporated
Counter Defendant: Broadcom Corporation, Broadcom Corporation and Broadcom Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Olson v. Tandberg Television, Inc. et al
as 3:2007cv02480
Plaintiff: James Olson and James Olson
Defendant: Tandberg Television, Inc. and Ericsson, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Kellie Appleton-Hultz et al v. Amcord Inc et al
as 2:2007cv02241
Plaintiff: Kellie Appleton-Hultz, Kellie Appleton-Hultz, Kimberly Hultz-Reed and others
Defendant: Amcord Inc, A. W. Chesterton Company, A. W. Chesterton Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Asbestos Litigation
Burton et al v. A.W. Chesterton Company et al
as 3:2007cv00703
Plaintiff: Geraldine Burton, Geraldine Burton, Geraldine Burton and others
Defendant: A.W. Chesterton Company, Allis-Chalmers Corporation Product Liability Trust, American Asbestos Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Burton et al v. A.W. Chesterton Company, Allis-Chalmers Corporation Product Liability Trust et al
as 3:2007cv00702
Plaintiff: Geraldine Burton, Geraldine Burton, Blaine Burton and others
Defendant: A.W. Chesterton Company, Allis-Chalmers Corporation Product Liability Trust, American Asbestos Company, Armstrong International, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?