Cases 1 - 10 of 38
LEVY et al v. USA
as 1:2023cv01466
Plaintiff:
JAMES M. LEVY, ESTATE OF RAQUEL LEVY, LAUREN R. SMOKE and others
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
RAFALSKA et al v. USA
as 1:2023cv01433
Plaintiff:
JANINA RAFALSKA, ROBYN K. RASCH, JONATHAN C. INABA and others
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
GIVENS et al v. USA
as 1:2023cv01396
Plaintiff:
GARY P. GIVENS, REVOCABLE TRUST OF GARY P. GIVENS, ESTATE OF WILLIAM J. DARLIN and others
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
TRIUMPH CS HOLDINGS, LLC et al v. USA
as 1:2023cv01248
Plaintiff:
TRIUMPH CS HOLDINGS, LLC, ROGER LEROY STOESZ, GCC INTERESTS, LLC doing business as MR. C'S BOAT & RV STORAGE and others
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
BESSENT v. USA
as 1:2023cv01187
Plaintiff:
QUENTIN IZEL BESSENT and Quentin Izel Bessent Estate
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
EDMUNDSON et al
as 1:2023cv01130
Plaintiff:
MELANIE F. EDMUNDSON, MIRANDA S. TODD, PAMELA C. TODD PITTS and others
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
BUY BELIZE, LLC et al v. USA
as 1:2023cv01025
Plaintiff:
BUY BELIZE, LLC, BUY INTERNATIONAL, INC., ECO-FUTURES DEVELOPMENT, LLC and others
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
KING SEMAJ OF THE ENGLISH ESTATE v. USA
as 1:2023cv01035
Plaintiff:
KING SEMAJ OF THE ENGLISH ESTATE
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
KING SEMAJ OF THE ENGLISH ESTATE v. USA
as 1:2023cv01033
Plaintiff:
KING SEMAJ OF THE ENGLISH ESTATE and JAMES THOMAS ENGLISH
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
KING SEMAJ OF THE ENGLISH ESTATE v. USA
as 1:2023cv01034
Plaintiff:
KING SEMAJ OF THE ENGLISH ESTATE and JAMES THOMAS ENGLISH
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
