Cases 31 - 40 of 131
Cutter et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 5:2019cv00443
Defendant:
Ethicon Women's Health and Urology, Gynecare, Ethicon, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Larry Cutter, Jenesta Cutter and Larry A. Cutter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Golden v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 3:2019cv00807
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Johnson and Johnson and Johnson & Johnson
Plaintiff:
Yvette Golden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Godwin et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 5:2019cv00437
Defendant:
Ethicon Women's Health and Urology, John Doe Corporations 1-50, C. R. Bard, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Larry Godwin and Linda Godwin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Petrey v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 5:2019cv00298
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Plaintiff:
Melissa Petrey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Johnson v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 0:2019cv00068
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Plaintiff:
Lunette Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Blair et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 3:2019cv00333
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Plaintiff:
Loretta Blair and Richard Blair
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 0:2018cv00045
Defendant:
Ashland Hospital Corporation, Johnson & Johnson, Gynecare and others
Executor:
Mark Smith
Plaintiff:
Patricia G. Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Thomas v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 1:2017cv00094
Plaintiff:
Sherri Thomas
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson and Ethicon, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sears v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 4:2017cv00069
Plaintiff:
Richard Sears
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson and Ethicon, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hinton v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 1:2017cv00095
Plaintiff:
Thomas Hinton
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson and Ethicon, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
