Cases filed in District of Columbia
Cases 1 - 10 of 18
TURNER BROTHERS INC. et al v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES et al
as 1:2024cv00843
Plaintiff: TURNER BROTHERS INC. d/b/a TURNER DRUGS CELEBRATION, ADVANCING HEALTH ACCESS, INC. and TURNER BROTHERS INC. doing business as TURNER DRUGS CELEBRATION
Defendant: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, MERCALIS INC. f/k/a TRIALCARD INCORPORATED, PHARMACY DATA MANAGEMENT, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
SAMSUNG DISPLAY CO., LTD. v. BOE TECHNOLOGY GROUP CO., LTD. et al
as 1:2024mc00012
Plaintiff: SAMSUNG DISPLAY CO., LTD.
Defendant: BOE TECHNOLOGY GROUP CO., LTD., MIANYANG BOE OPTOELECTRONICS TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD., ORDOS YUANSHENG OPTOELECTRONICS CO., LTD. and others
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA v. JTH TAX We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv03165
Plaintiff: DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Defendant: JTH Tax, LLC f/k/a JTH Tax, Inc., d/b/a Liberty Tax Service, JTH TAX, LLC formerly known as JTH TAX, INC doing business as LIBERTY TAX SERVICES and JTH TAX, INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
PETRUSS MEDIA GROUP, LLC et al v. ADVANTAGE SALES & MARKETING LLC et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv03278
Petitioner: PETRUSS MEDIA GROUP, LLC, F/K/A TAKE 5 MEDIA GROUP, LLC, ALEXANDER RADETICH, RICHARD GLUCK and others
Respondent: ADVANTAGE SALES & MARKETING LLC, ADVANTAGE SALES & MARKETING, INC.,, KARMAN INTERMEDIATE CORP. and others
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 0010 Petition to Vacate Arbitration Award
METROPOLIS SPECIAL POLICE DEPARTMENT v. D.A.T.A. MANAGEMENT CONSULTING, LLC et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2021cv02171
Plaintiff: METROPOLIS SPECIAL POLICE DEPARTMENT F/K/A METROPOLITAN SPECIAL POLICE DEPARTMENT, METROPOLIS SPECIAL POLICE DEPARTMENT and METROPOLITAN SPECIAL POLICE DEPARTMENT
Defendant: D.A.T.A. MANAGEMENT CONSULTING, LLC and GOLD SHIELD SECURITY CONSULTANTS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
WEBUILD S.P.A. v. ARGENTINE REPUBLIC
as 1:2021cv02464
Plaintiff: WEBUILD S.P.A., f/k/a IMPREGILO S.P.A., WEBUILD S.P.A., and IMPREGILO S.P.A.
Defendant: ARGENTINE REPUBLIC
Cause Of Action: 27 U.S.C. § 185
E.L. ELECTRICAL SERVICE, LLC v. FEI-WINMAR JV, LLC et al
as 1:2021cv01996
Defendant: FEI-WINMAR JV, LLC and QBE INSURANCE CORPORATION
Not Classified By Court: E.L. ELECTRICAL SERVICE, LLC, F/K/A E.L. ELECTRICAL SERVICES, LLC
Plaintiff: E.L. ELECTRICAL SERVICE, LLC and E.L. ELECTRICAL SERVICES, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1352
Type: Contract Miller Act
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION v. COMPLETE BUSINESS SOLUTIONS GROUP, INC. et al
as 1:2020mc00069
Defendant: ABFP MANAGEMENT COMPANY, LLC f/k/a/ PILLAR LIFE SETTLEMENT MANAGEMENT COMPANY, LLC, JOSEPH COLE BARLETA a/k/a/ JOE COLE, JOSEPH W. LAFORTE a/k/a JOE MACK a/k/a/ JOE MACKI a/k/a JOE MCELHONE and others
Receiver: Ryan K. Stumphauzer, Esquire as Receiver for Complete Business Solutions Group, Inc. d/b/a PAR Funding and RYAN K. STUMPHAUZER Esquire, as Receiver for Complete Business Solutions Group, Inc. d/b/a PAR Funding
Plaintiff: SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
HIGH LEVEL MANAGEMENT VENTURERS v. BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY et al
as 1:2020cv01024
Defendant: NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY, BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY, UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY and others
Plaintiff: HIGH LEVEL MANAGEMENT VENTURERS (F/K/A INTERDOM PARTNERS), HIGH LEVEL MANAGEMENT VENTURERS and INTERDOM PARTNERS
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
NOVA OCULUS PARTNERS, LLC v. U.S. FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020cv01174
Plaintiff: NOVA OCULUS PARTNERS, LLC, f/k/a THE EYE MACHINE, LLC, NOVA OCULUS PARTNERS, LLC and EYE MACHINE, LLC
Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and U.S. FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?