Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Edwards v. F&M Property Managment
as 4:2022cv00495
Plaintiff:
Larry R Edwards
Defendant:
F&M Property Managment
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Edwards v. F&M Property Managment
as 4:2022cv00309
Plaintiff:
Larry R Edwards
Defendant:
F&M Property Managment
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
F&M Bank and Trust Company, The vs. Smith
as 4:2014cv00050
Plaintiff:
F&M Bank and Trust Company, The
Defendant:
Delford M Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
United States of America v. Proceeds of F&M Bank Account Number XXX3586 in the amount of $14,224.15 in United States Currency
as 4:2013cv00412
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Proceeds of F&M Bank Account Number XXX3586 in the amount of $14,224.15 in United States Currency
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 3372
Thurman et al v. Koch Industries et al
as 4:2011cv00289
Plaintiff:
Diana L Thurman , Holly J Young and Dawn R Webb
Defendant:
Koch Industries , MetLife Insurance Company , F&M Bank & Trust Co., The and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
First Pryority Bank v. First Tennessee Bank et al
as 4:2010cv00434
Plaintiff:
First Pryority Bank
Defendant:
F&M Bank & Trust Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
F&M Bank & Trust Company, The v. Tolbert et al
as 4:2010cv00163
Plaintiff:
F&M Bank & Trust Company, The
Defendant:
Stephen R Tolbert , Terry L Stalnecker , John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2008cv00171
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Trustee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2007cv00044
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158 Notice of Appeal re Bankruptcy Matter (BAP)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
