Cases filed in the US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Cases 31 - 40 of 51
Mason v MortgageIT, Inc. et al
as 2:2010cv00986
Plaintiff: Delicia Mason
Receiver: Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation as Receiver for Defendant IndyMac Federal Bank, FSB
Defendant: MortgageIT, Inc., NDEX West, LLC, MD Mortgage Group, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 1819
Martin v. U.S. Bank National Association, Successor in Interest to the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation as Receiver for Downey Savings and Loan Association, F.A. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2010cv00634
Plaintiff: Anthony J Martin
Defendant: U.S. Bank National Association, Successor in Interest to the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation as Receiver for Downey Savings and Loan Association, F.A. and FCI Lender Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Larue et al v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation as Receiver for Defendant IndyMac Bank, FSB et al
as 2:2010at00417
Plaintiff: Edmund Jay Larue and Linda Jean larue
Defendant: Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation as Receiver for Defendant IndyMac Bank, FSB , Federal Deposit Insurance Coproration as Receiver for Defendant IndyMac Bank, FSB , Aztec Foreclosure Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 1819
Larue et al v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2010cv00818
Plaintiff: Edmund Jay Larue and Linda Jean larue
Defendant: Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation , Aztec Foreclosure Corporation , Mortgage Electronic Registration System, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
Ravlov v. FDIC et al., We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2010cv00752
Plaintiff: Ivan Ravlov
Defendant: Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation , Aztec Foreclosure Corporation and MERS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Camello et al v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2010cv00584
Plaintiff: Romando Camello and Gina Camello
Defendant: Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation and MTC Financial Inc.
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 1819 Default of Promissory Note
Garner v. Indymac Federal Bank et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2010cv00492
Plaintiff: Debra A. Garner
Defendant: IndyMac, F.S.B., Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc., American Pacific Mortgage Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 1821 Default of Loan by Promissary Note
v. JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. FOR ITSELF AND AS AN ACQUIRER OF CERTAIN ASSETS AND LIABILITIES OF WASHINGTON MUTUAL BANK FROM THE FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION ACTING AS RECEIVER, erroneously sued
as 2:2009at01792
Defendant: JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. FOR ITSELF AND AS AN ACQUIRER OF CERTAIN ASSETS AND LIABILITIES OF WASHINGTON MUTUAL BANK FROM THE FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION ACTING AS RECEIVER, erroneously sued
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Type: Contract None
v. U.S. Bank National Association, Successor in Interest to the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation as Receiver for Downey Savings and Loan Association, F.A. et al
as 2:2009at01593
Defendant: U.S. Bank National Association, Successor in Interest to the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation as Receiver for Downey Savings and Loan Association, F.A. and DSL Service Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., An Acquirer Of Certain Assets And Liabilities Of Washington Mutual Bank From The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Acting As Receiver
as 2:2009at01497
Defendant: JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., An Acquirer Of Certain Assets And Liabilities Of Washington Mutual Bank From The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Acting As Receiver
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
Type: Real Property None

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?