Cases 11 - 20 of 34
Federal National Mortgage Association v. Jones
as 1:2016cv07793
Plaintiff:
Federal National Mortgage Association
Defendant:
Latreece A. Jones
Counter_claimant:
Latreece A. Jones
Counter_defendant:
Federal National Mortgage Association
Third_party_defendant:
Seterus, Inc. and McCalla Raymer Pierce, LLC
Thirdparty_plaintiff:
Latreece A. Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv07435
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv07056
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv06788
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Williams v. Federal National Mortgage Association et al
as 1:2016cv05553
Plaintiff:
Earnestine Williams
Defendant:
Federal National Mortgage Association and Charles Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Luna v. Federal National Mortgage Association
as 1:2016cv04617
Plaintiff:
Clarence Luna
Defendant:
Federal National Mortgage Association
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv03115
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Kasboske et al v. J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. et al
as 1:2016cv02927
Plaintiff:
George Kasboske and Hannah Kasboske
Defendant:
J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A., Pierce & Associates and Federal National Mortgage Association
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Faulkner et al v. Loftus et al
as 1:2016cv02432
Plaintiff:
Marvin Faulkner and Samuel C Umunna
Defendant:
Anna M. Loftus, William Farrow, Pierce & Associates and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv09682
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0045
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
