Cases 41 - 50 of 178
Federal National Mortgage Association v. Divina Albasete George et al
as 5:2014cv01679
Defendant:
Does and Divina Albasete George
Plaintiff:
Federal National Mortgage Association
Federal National Mortgage Association v. Nelly Esther Domenack et al
as 5:2014cv01395
Defendant:
Does and Nelly Esther Domenack
Plaintiff:
Federal National Mortgage Association
Federal National Mortgage Association v. Judy A Adame et al
as 5:2014cv01280
Defendant:
Judy A Adame, Does and Adries Swan
Plaintiff:
Federal National Mortgage Association
Federal National Mortgage Association v. Shawnna Brown et al
as 5:2014cv01220
Defendant:
Shawnna Brown and Does
Plaintiff:
Federal National Mortgage Association
Federal National Mortgage Association v. David Boyd et al
as 2:2014cv03427
Defendant:
All Persons and Entities Known or Unknown, David Boyd, David Boyd and others
Plaintiff:
Federal National Mortgage Association
Nelly Domenack v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, a national association et al
as 2:2014cv03432
Defendant:
Chase Bank USA N.A., Daffin Frappier, Treder & Weiss, Does and others
Plaintiff:
Nelly Domenack
Nelly Domenack v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, a national association et al
as 5:2014cv00903
Defendant:
Chase Bank USA N.A., Daffin Frappier, Treder & Weiss, Does and others
Plaintiff:
Nelly Domenack
Federal National Mortgage Association v. Nelly Esther Domenack et al
as 5:2014cv00843
Defendant:
Does and Nelly Esther Domenack
Plaintiff:
Federal National Mortgage Association
Federal National Mortgage Association v. Cupp et al
as 3:2014cv01597
Plaintiff:
Federal National Mortgage Association
Defendant:
Ronald Cupp and Monica Cupp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Federal National Mortgage Association v. Nunez et al
as 3:2014cv00681
Plaintiff:
Federal National Mortgage Association
Defendant:
Juan J. Nunez, Suzanne Nunez and Does I through X, Inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
