Cases 21 - 30 of 67
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv01155
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION v. EPICUREAN FOODS, LLC et al
as 1:2016cv01154
Plaintiff:
FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION
Defendant:
EPICUREAN FOODS, LLC, RC CT AVENUE RESTAURANT, LLC , CHANG W. CHON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00544
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1666
FAM v. BANK OF AMERICA NA (USA) et al
as 1:2015cv01943
Plaintiff:
MARK FAM
Defendant:
BANK OF AMERICA NA (USA), FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION , DANIEL WHITEHEAD and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv01569
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
BROOKS v. FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION et al
as 1:2015cv01158
Plaintiff:
DWIGHT ELLIS BROOKS
Defendant:
FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ROSEMARY M. COLLYER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00450
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Petition for Removal- Civil Rights
BROOKS v. MAHFOUZ et al
as 1:2015cv00407
Plaintiff:
DWIGHT ELLIS BROOKS
Defendant:
NGA MAHFOUZ, MARY MCGOWAN, CHRIS PIAZZA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
BRADLEY et al v. FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION et al
as 1:2014cv01426
Plaintiff:
RALPH J. BRADLEY and CHARLENE BRADLEY
Defendant:
FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION and JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7609
RICH et al v. BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.,
as 1:2014mc00336
Plaintiff:
JUDITH M. RICH and VINCENT VITALE
Defendant:
BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.
Respondent:
FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION (FANNIE MAE)
Cause Of Action: Motion to Enforce Subpoena
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
