Cases 1 - 10 of 24
Gonzalez Gonzalez v. Garland
as 23-1162
Petitioner:
FELIPE GONZALEZ GONZALEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
USA v. Felipe Garcia
as 22-4074
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
FELIPE GONZALEZ GARCIA
USA v. Felipe Garcia
as 22-4078
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
FELIPE GONZALEZ GARCIA
USA v. Felipe Gonzalez-Alvarez
as 22-50050
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
FELIPE GONZALEZ-ALVAREZ
USA v. Felipe Gonzalez-Alvarez
as 22-50049
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
FELIPE GONZALEZ-ALVAREZ
Hicks v. Davis
as 21-40800
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Robert Lee Hicks
Defendant / Appellee:
Lorie Davis, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division, Individually and in official capacity, Warden Felipe Gonzalez, Individually and in official capacity, Assistant Warden Anthony Patrick, Individually and in official capacity and others
Luna v. Davis
as 21-50578
Defendant / Appellee:
Ar'Lisa Simon-Hastings, Chief Classification, terrell Unit, Texas Department of Criminal Justie - Correctional Institutions Division, Brian Collier, Executive Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Lorie Davis, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Richard Luna
Oscar Gonzalez v. William Barr
as 20-72329
Petitioner:
OSCAR FELIPE GONZALEZ
Respondent:
WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General
Mark Munoz v. Felipe Gonzalez, Jr., et al
as 20-20402
Defendant / Appellee:
Anthony Patrick, Sr., Assitant Warden, C.T. Terrell Unit, Lorie Davis, Felipe Gonzalez, Jr., Head Warden, C.T. Terrell Unit and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Mark A. Munoz
Ervin Gonzalez-Lopez v. William Barr
as 20-70638
Petitioner:
ERVIN FELIPE GONZALEZ-LOPEZ
Respondent:
WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
