Cases 1 - 7 of 7
SILVERS et al v. ACANDS INC et al
as 2:2009cv72981
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM H. SILVERS, WILLIAM H. SILVERS, WILMA J. SILVERS and others
Defendant:
ACANDS INC, ACANDS INC, ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
WHITE v. ACANDS INCORPORATED et al
as 2:2007cv61424
Plaintiff:
THOMAS E. WHITE
Defendant:
ACANDS INCORPORATED, ACANDS INCORPORATED, ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES,INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
HOSKINS et al v. ACANDS INCORPORATED et al
as 2:2007cv61428
Plaintiff:
NORMAN L HOSKINS and VICKI HOSKINS
Defendant:
ACANDS INCORPORATED, ACANDS INCORPORATED, ACANDS INCORPORATED and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
DAWSON et al v. AQUA-CHEM, INC. et al
as 2:2007cv61461
Plaintiff:
ROY FOSTER DAWSON and GRACE F. DAWSON
Defendant:
AQUA-CHEM, INC., AQUA-CHEM, INC., BORG-WARNER CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
COOPER v. ACANDS INC et al
as 2:2007cv61429
Plaintiff:
CLARENCE NMN COOPER
Defendant:
ACANDS INC, ALLIED SIGNAL INC., ALLIED SIGNAL INC. and others
ThirdParty Defendant:
ATLAS TURNER INC., ATLAS TURNER INC., LAC D'AMIANTE DU QUEBEC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
ANTONE et al v. ACANDS INC et al
as 2:2007cv61422
Plaintiff:
PETER C ANTONE and PAT YARBOROUGH
Petitioner:
LISA R ANTONE
Defendant:
ACANDS INC, ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
MCCOY et al v. ACANDS INC et al
as 2:2007cv61427
Plaintiff:
FRED J MCCOY, SALLIE S MCCOY, WILLIAM H SILVERS and others
Defendant:
ACANDS INC, ACANDS INC, ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
