Cases 1 - 7 of 7
MORRIS et al v. ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN
as 1:2023cv01941
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL A. MORRIS, JESSE URENA, BRIANNE CROOKS and others
Defendant:
ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act
O'DIAH v. ROBERTS et al
as 1:2023cv00653
Defendant:
UNITED STATES SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION, SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, JOHN G. ROBERTS and others
Plaintiff:
AROR-ARK ARK O'DIAH
Claimant:
SYNCHRONY BANK and PARK & NGUYEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
ESTATE OF CARMEN E. CRESPO et al v. DEMOCRATIC PEOPLE'S REPUBLIC OF KOREA
as 1:2022cv01514
Plaintiff:
CARMEN E. CRESPO, MARCIANO CRESPO-GONZALEZ, CARMEN M. MARTINEZ-CAMACHO and others
Defendant:
DEMOCRATIC PEOPLE'S REPUBLIC OF KOREA and NORTH KOREA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act
ESTATE OF CHRISTOPHER BROOK FISHBECK et al v. ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN et al
as 1:2018cv02248
Plaintiff:
BEATRIZ BELTRAN, RONALD EVERETT LOTT, RAMONA BELTRAN and others
Defendant:
NATIONAL IRANIAN OIL COMPANY, ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN, BANK MARKAZI JOMHOURI ISLAMI IRAN and others
Respondent:
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act
SANCHEZ-CANETE v. BOQUIN BANEGAS et al
as 1:2017cv00905
Plaintiff:
JESUS SANCHEZ-CANETE
Defendant:
MIRIAN Y. BOQUIN BANEGAS, SUANY LISSETH CARDENAS BOQUIN, ANA CASTILLO MARTINEZ and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ACOSTA ORELLANA et al v. CROPLIFE INTERNATIONAL et al
as 1:2008cv01790
Plaintiff:
JORGE WASHINGTON ACOSTA ORELLANA, JORGE ALFREDO ARAGUNDI LA MOTA, JORGE VINCENTE ACOSTA GARRIDO and others
Defendant:
CROPLIFE INTERNATIONAL, CROPLIFE ECUADOR, DOW CHEMICAL COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
AGUERO et al v. SPOTTS et al
as 1:2008cv00044
Plaintiff:
KELVIN ANDRE SPOTTS, BILLY AGUERO, MARCUS T. ARNOLD and others
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
