Cases 1 - 10 of 264
Franco Rodriguez, et al. v. Garland
as 24-2305
Petitioner:
EDER JOSUE FRANCO RODRIGUEZ, ANA YADIRA VALENCIA OCHOA and NICOLE FRANCO VALENCIA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Lawrence Distributing Company Inc. et al v. Parimar Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02307
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Distributing Company Inc. and ASL Produce LLC
Defendant:
Parimar Inc. a California corporation doing business as D. De Franco & Sons, Richard De Franco, Paul De Franco and others
Cause Of Action: 07 U.S.C. ยง 499 Agricultural Commodities Act
Franco-De Rivera, et al. v. Garland
as 24-1623
Petitioner:
JENIFFER ALEJANDRA FRANCO-DE RIVERA and ANDRE RIVERA-FRANCO
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
United States of America v. Plaza-Uzeta
as 24-836
Defendant:
RUBEN PLAZA-UZETA and Ruben Franco-Plaza
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
In re Naturalization Ceremony 2/27/2024
as 3:2024mc80035
Not Yet Classified:
Naturalization Ceremony, Sofya Abraham, Eric Yan Bao and others
In re Naturalization Ceremony 2/27/2024
as 3:2024mc80044
Not Yet Classified:
Sofya Abraham, Eric Yan Bao, Emma Baran and others
Araujo Da Silva, et al. v. Garland
as 23-4388
Petitioner:
GUILHERME ARAUJO DA SILVA, GIZELE FRANCO-VALADARES SILVA, LUIZA FRANCO-SILVA and others
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Martinez v. City of Santa Maria, et al.
as 23-4277
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ESTEBAN MARTINEZ
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF SANTA MARIA, PHIL HANSEN, JESUS VALLE, No 19091 and others
Silva Franco, et al. v. Garland
as 23-4014
Petitioner:
JHONATAS AMORIM SILVA FRANCO, GISLAINE FRANCO VALADARES AMORIM, BENHOUR FRANCO VALADARES AMORIM and others
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Barstow Proprietor Association, et al. v. City of Barstow, et al.
as 23-3935
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BARSTOW PROPRIETOR ASSOCIATION, BALUBHAI G. PATEL, IRA GWIN and others
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF BARSTOW, a municipal corporation, MEGHAN A. WHARTON and DOES, 1-10 Inclusive
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
