Cases 1 - 7 of 7
POTTER et al v. C.D.J., INC. et al
as 3:2019cv19923
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK P. POTTER, JR., RICK WORKMAN, BOARDS OF TRUSTEES OF TEAMSTERS LOCAL 469 PENSION, WELFARE AND ANNUITY FUNDS AND TEAMSTERS LOCAL UNION NO. 469 and others
Defendant:
CDJ CONTRACTING CORP., C.D.J., INC., TARHEEL ENTERPRISES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1131
POTTER, JR. et al v. C.D.J., INC., et al
as 2:2017cv03409
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK P POTTER, JR. , MICHAEL L. BRODERICK , MICHAEL TKATCH and others
Defendant:
C.D.J., INC., CDJ CONTRACTING CORP. and TARHEEL ENTERPRISES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1145
POTTER et al v. THE PHILLIPS COMPANIES, LLC. et al
as 3:2014cv03242
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK P. POTTER, JR. , MICHAEL L. BRODERICK , MICHAEL TKATCH and others
Defendant:
THE PHILLIPS COMPANIES, LLC., PHILLIPS CONCRETE, INC., F. F. PHILLIPS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
POTTER, JR. et al v. HOLGATE PROPERTY et al
as 3:2013cv01153
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK P. POTTER, JR. , MICHAEL L. BRODERICK , MICHAEL TKATCH and others
Defendant:
HOLGATE PROPERTY, RUN FOR THE ROSES, LLC. and R.W. VOGEL LAND & LIVESTOCK SOUTH, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1145 E.R.I.S.A.
POTTER, JR. et al v. SIL-KEMP CONCRETE, INC.
as 3:2013cv00817
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK P. POTTER, JR. , MICHAEL L. BRODERICK , MICHAEL TKATCH and others
Defendant:
SIL-KEMP CONCRETE, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
POTTER, JR. et al v. FREDERICKS FUEL & HEATING SERVICE
as 3:2013cv00848
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK P. POTTER, JR. , MICHAEL L. BRODERICK , MICHAEL TKATCH and others
Defendant:
FREDERICKS FUEL & HEATING SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
POTTER et al v. SAUNDERS
as 3:2013cv00847
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK P. POTTER, JR. , MICHAEL L. BRODERICK , MICHAEL TKATCH and others
Defendant:
SUSAN F. SAUNDERS
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
