Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Andom, Inc. v. Shenzhen Conkly Technology Co., Ltd. et al
as 1:2025cv07032
Plaintiff:
Andom, Inc.
Defendant:
Shenzhen Conkly Technology Co., Ltd., Shenzhen Dibet Technology Co., Ltd., Dongguan Jianhe Metal & Plastic Co., Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Trademark Infringement
Hong Kong Leyuzhen Technology Co. Limited v. The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified in Schedule A Hereto
as 1:2024cv07059
Defendant:
The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified in Schedule A Hereto, allr6828, 47356_y3xym and others
Plaintiff:
Hong Kong Leyuzhen Technology Co. Limited
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Milwaukee Electric Tool Corporation v. The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A Hereto
as 1:2023cv04593
Plaintiff:
Milwaukee Electric Tool Corporation
Defendant:
The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A Hereto, 020 Store, 0241 Store and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 44 Trademark Infringement
Art Ask Agency v. The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A Hereto
as 1:2023cv02212
Plaintiff:
Art Ask Agency
Defendant:
The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A Hereto, BKQU Oversize Store, Dinboa-6 Store and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 44 Trademark Infringement
Dyson Technology Limited v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
as 1:2023cv01721
Plaintiff:
Dyson Technology Limited
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, Ningbo Lefan Trading Co., Ltd., Shenzhen Wolinsheng Technology Co., Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
John Doe v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
as 1:2023cv00520
Plaintiff:
John Doe
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, Dehua Beauty Rich Arts & Crafts Co., Ltd, Quanzhou Deerli Arts & Crafts Co., Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
NHL Enterprises, L.P. v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
as 1:2022cv07100
Plaintiff:
NHL Enterprises, L.P.
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, Foshan Yaoyang Flag Co., Ltd., 3D Clothing Factory Outlet Store and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Nirvana, L.L.C. v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A"
as 1:2021cv05361
Plaintiff:
Nirvana, L.L.C.
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A", Shenzhen Longgang District Bainatong Firm, Xiamen Qianfanhang Trading Co., Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
PINK FLOYD (1987) LIMITED v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A"
as 1:2021cv01438
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A", yiwushiyalingdianzishangwuyouxiangongsi, guangzhouyuelaishangmaoyouxiangongsi and others
Plaintiff:
PINK FLOYD (1987) LIMITED
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Automobili Lamborghini America, LLC v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A"
as 1:2021cv01310
Plaintiff:
Automobili Lamborghini America, LLC
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A", Chenggan, CM- Accessories Store and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
