Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Tafari v. Rucker, et al.
as 24-2842
Plaintiff:
RAS HEZEKIAH TAFARI
Defendant:
YVETTE RUCKER, JULIE RANDALL, GARRY MOLER and others
Mitchell v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, et al.
as 23-3811
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RONALD MITCHELL
Defendant / Appellee:
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION, J. BENEVIDAZ, Warden, PATRICK COVELLO, Warden and others
Shannon Sobaskiewicz, et al v. FedEx Corporation, et al
as 22-80028
Petitioner:
SHANNON SOBASKIEWICZ and KEVIN STERLING, individually and on behalf of all other similarly situated, and as a proxy of the State of California on behalf of aggrieved employees, and Herman Overpeck individually, only
Respondent:
FEDEX CORPORATION and FEDEX GROUND PACKAGE SYSTEM, INC.
Robert Swint v. Oregon State Hospital, et al
as 21-35375
Defendant / Appellee:
AM BEST, AMTRAK, 62 BILLION and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT JAMES SWINT
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 20-16950
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Kuang-Bao Ou-Young v. Edward LEAVY, et al
as 19-17031
Defendant / Appellee:
RUTH BADER GINSBURG, U.S. Supreme Court Justice, and as an individual, SAMUEL CONTI, Former District Judge, U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, and his estate, MARY M. SCHROEDER, and as an individual and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KUANG-BAO P. OU-YOUNG
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 16-56346
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 13-17589
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 13-56737
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 13-35349
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
